The same correction has to be made over and over.
Reviewed corrections are designed to carry into future work of the same kind.
Repeated attempts quietly raise the cost of the work.
Repeated work is surfaced so its cause can be investigated and removed.
Nobody can say whether a change actually improved anything.
Results before and after a change are comparable, so the effect can be reviewed.
Useful knowledge.
Better-informed changes.
knowledge into the task.
corrections forward.
problems.
cost and performance.
for the next change.
the change helped.
Intended capability. Current product availability and enforcement remain unverified.
Correction reuse, and operational improvement.
Reusing a reviewed correction changes the next result. Operational improvement changes how the work runs. They are separate, and both stay reviewable.
Illustration of intended design. Current product availability and enforcement remain unverified.